*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://shaara.writing.com/main/authors.php/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
vocab's Portfolio!
Registered Author
vapid
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend to try and be fairly succinct, I have a deep love for verbose and interesting language, taking large preference to poetry. If you want some critique or suggestion on such, I'd be happy to help!
jim-d's Portfolio!
Moderator
Sum1
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Casual for the most part. I will point out errors I see and offer suggested corrections. I like to focus on the content and formatting of the item. I love providing helpful comments and feedback that may improve the item if acted on.
jesusfreak95's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Glorify Him
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I will be honest in all my reviews. I will give you both good and negative feedback, and I will not hold back on the truth. My main goal is for the author to take my feedback and mold it into ideas on how to better their writing.
hdhdhsksid's Portfolio!
Registered User
Dhsvsgsj
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Not very strict. Decent grammar, spelling. Uniqueness And good story telling. That's how you will get a good review.
Preferred Author
edgework
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Unsentimental. I focus on the kinds of craft issues that will keep a writer from being taken seriously and prevent them from fully expressing their vision. For more information, see "Writing Hurts: Review Forum
dragonline's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
dragonline (dragon online)
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I'm blunt, tell it like it is as I assume that's what is wanted. I give positives/negatives and details.
Preferred Author
tracker
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Overall impression, likes, suggestions, positive closing. I am honored to do reviews upon request, usually on the first day 2023 Quill Winner
notjackson's Portfolio!
Registered Author
jackson
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am not an expert reviewer, but I have some small amount of talent in the field of writing. I will not edit your work, but typos, grammar mistakes, etc. will be pointed out if I see them. I will give you my impression of your work, encourage you, and do my best to review the work.
elfmage7's Portfolio!
Moderator
Dawn Embers
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Disclaimer: I am not good at remembering to do requested reviews. Often I have busy things going on with work and my own novels, so sorry if I decline or don't remember to do a review in the short time given. Just a warning. When I review: Long. Depending on the type of story and reason for review I tend to get anywhere from 4,000 characters to on the rare occasion over 10,000. I will make overall comments, technical points and even offer sources when necessary but a lot is dependent on what I'm reviewing. I can even do a full edit but that's take a lot of niceness and time.
Preferred Author
Dee
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
I am honest and respectful, and try to be as diplomatic as possible when I review a piece of writing. I use a template to cover most writing elements, as well as giving you my personal thoughts and feelings about it. I rate fair and equal to the review I give, but I only give a rating of 5 if the piece is perfect, in my opinion.
rmcgee's Portfolio!
Registered Author
RobMcGee
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
Mostly just bitchin'. If it's great writing I switch over to nit-picking but usually I'll find something to like. Please don't ask me to review poetry unless you're either James Fenton, Seamus Heaney or thick skinned as an elephant... I absolutely hate bad poetry. I'm the terror of the dactyls, I swat them with my hat. I'll have no truck with trochees, coz life's too short for that. Seriously I'm not qualified. I mean a metre is made up of feet? Like what?
wyrd_naos's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
WyrdNaos Trippin' on Yello
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to be analytical in my reviewing. The most interesting pieces of writing often work on a number of different levels, and so I try to consider multiple perspectives when informing the author of what I liked or disliked about their piece. For this reason, I don't get along very well with templates, as I find they turn the whole process into something very clinical! You can expect my reviews to be a fluid, tailored discussion of your individual work.
Preferred Author
Liam
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
I like to emphasize the positive attributes of your work, but I will offer suggestions for improvement if I'm able.
Preferred Author
Words Whirling 'Round
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Every word we put to paper comes from someone else. We learn from parents, teachers, books, movies, idle conversations - our entire life becomes our source material. The only thing that's original and unique is our choice of how we put the words together. To be 100% honest, we'd have to credit the Dictionary, Thesaurus, and Google for every poem and story. I may suggest changes in my review. This is not meant as 'serious' literary criticism (I’m no expert). It's merely my record of the ‘bumps’ I encounter as I travel through your words. If I'm thrown by a typo, an awkward word, or a line that doesn't scan, then it's likely that others will be as well. My intent in giving a review is to applaud your work and maybe help you to improve it. A review is merely another reference to consider. If the suggestions prove useful, then use them. If I ‘just don’t get it’, then by all means ignore me! Only the author can take credit for the final words, no matter what the source.
joewong's Portfolio!
Registered Author
JW Fiction
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'll give you my honest opinion and find something positive for you to build on. I'll try to be as thorough as possible in my review.
soledad_moon's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Elisa the Bunny Stik
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
In a single word, thorough. I will turn your piece upside down, shake the change out of its pockets and look at even the most minute details. I can be technical but will do so when emphasizing a larger point about the piece as a whole.
jotokai's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Joto-Kai
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like a review that makes me edit, even if it bothers me or offends me. So I look at your piece with, "What would I change to make this better and why?" And I write down most of what I think... the limit being how much you paid, more than how much you can handle! And of course there's no guarantee that my advice won't make it worse. Well, except the long list of bestseller credits-- oh, I haven't published them yet. But feel free to request a refund if I really like your piece. It's happened, sometimes I'm in too good of a mood and I think your work is perfect. If it was, you'd be submitting it for a royalty advance... praise is nice but it's like Chinese food, you need more in an hour. Whereas critique sticks to your ribs...
aundria_k's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Angels in my Ear
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I enjoy reviewing and try to be as honest as possible. I look for specific things such as technical merit, flow and lyrical quality in poems, creativity, tone, and mood. Though I can be a tough critic, I strive to encourage writers to grow and challenge themselves. I feel that it is through constructive criticism that we grow as writers. I strive to give the writer feedback on the overall impact of the piece. I am the host and judge of the "Shadows and Light Poetry Contest and co-host of the "Roots & Wings Contest
Registered Author
Cupadraig~The Remote Country
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm not sure what this means. I am honest in my review(s) and try to offer constructive advice when I find something amiss. I also enjoy pointing out what works for me in your story so you get equal positive. I want to help you get better. That's why we are here.
dnadream's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
~SilverMoon~
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I look at the title, premise, overall structure first. Then I see how it makes me feel. After that, I might comment on little errors which are easily fixed.
Printed from https://shaara.writing.com/main/authors.php/action/reviewers